Episode 20 — Network mounts overview: NFS vs SMB/Samba and what symptoms look like

Network mounts are on Linux+ because they test whether you can reason about shared storage as a service dependency, not just a directory. This episode explains NFS and SMB/Samba as two approaches to file sharing with different integration patterns, authentication expectations, and failure behaviors. You’ll learn exam-focused distinctions: how Linux clients typically consume each protocol, what “server side” versus “client side” responsibility looks like, and why permissions and identity mapping are often the hidden cause of access issues. The goal is to help you read a scenario—users can’t access a share, mounts hang, permissions look wrong—and quickly decide whether you’re dealing with connectivity, name resolution, authentication, or protocol-specific configuration.
we focus on symptoms and a practical troubleshooting mindset that aligns with PBQs. You’ll practice distinguishing “can’t reach server” from “can reach but can’t authenticate” and from “authenticated but access denied,” because each points to a different layer and a different fix. We also cover operational considerations: how network mounts affect boot if configured as mandatory, why timeouts and retries can appear as slow application behavior, and how to reduce blast radius by making remote dependencies explicit. Finally, you’ll learn a reliability-first approach: verify the server export/share exists, confirm client resolution and routing, test authentication in isolation, then mount with options that match your stability goals so “shared storage” does not become “shared outages.” Produced by BareMetalCyber.com, where you’ll find more cyber audio courses, books, and information to strengthen your educational path. Also, if you want to stay up to date with the latest news, visit DailyCyber.News for a newsletter you can use, and a daily podcast you can commute with.
Episode 20 — Network mounts overview: NFS vs SMB/Samba and what symptoms look like
Broadcast by